(I cleaned the title (which used bursts case for the "privacy" bit), which seemed in ambiguous, not really justified bad taste.)
I wanted to note the paradox:
-- when you train a "conscious" mind, it has to be protocolar: "I saw John yesterday doing that"; "I read in this manual that John Adams died on July 4"; "My grandmother told me about those events in the war" - otherwise, its untracked notions will be even more "hearsay".
-- current NN training appears still focused on statistical language analysis, and not yet on (practical) theories of knowledge... And paradoxically by attempting to improve the system through eavesdropping, the protocolar principle (proper of "read a good book") is dropped for decency.
(I cleaned the title (which used bursts case for the "privacy" bit), which seemed in ambiguous, not really justified bad taste.)
I wanted to note the paradox:
-- when you train a "conscious" mind, it has to be protocolar: "I saw John yesterday doing that"; "I read in this manual that John Adams died on July 4"; "My grandmother told me about those events in the war" - otherwise, its untracked notions will be even more "hearsay".
-- current NN training appears still focused on statistical language analysis, and not yet on (practical) theories of knowledge... And paradoxically by attempting to improve the system through eavesdropping, the protocolar principle (proper of "read a good book") is dropped for decency.