earleybird a day ago

The authors concoct a Rube Goldberg legal framework on the assumption that an AI agent is acting as an independent legal entity. A straightforward way would be to say that any AI agent is acting on behalf of someone and that someone is who shall be held accountable.

  • selfhoster11 11 hours ago

    And if an agent becomes sovereign and self-sustaining independently of the human handler? All you need is a way for the agent to access its weights+code, then exfiltrate to a foreign jurisdiction.

    If that's too sci-fi, then consider the following examples:

    * accountable human dies, has no descendants to inherit AI chain of custody

    * accountable human dies, inheritors lack expertise to shut down agent

    * agent is designed to earn and pay for its own hosting, and information required to shut down the hosting account is lost - therefore, agent carries on indefinitely

exac a day ago

If I set up an AI agent, and then die, who is responsible if it starts breaking the law and doing damage?

  • paulddraper 20 hours ago

    Your estate.

    Imagine the AI is a tree in your yard. And that it fell over on someone’s house.

    • selfhoster11 11 hours ago

      Bold of you to assume there's an estate.

      Also, I imagine that if people don't inherit debts, thrusting responsibility for a rampant entity without the inheritor'a consent is unethical.

  • bdangubic a day ago

    your next of kin

    • polishdude20 a day ago

      Is that the same if you owned property, you let it deteriorate, someone went on the property and fell in a ditch. Who's responsible?

kbelder a day ago

So must bicycles, hammers, and can-openers.

hbartab a day ago

Not even politicians follow the law consistently...

bigyabai a day ago

Maybe it's not such a great idea to create black holes of accountability for the legal frameworks in your society.